Abstract
Due to recent rises in extremism across the globe (Dean et al. in J Polic Intell Count Terror 11:121–142, 2016; Le Roux in Responding to the rise in violent extremism in the Sahel. Africa Center For Strategic Studies, 2019, p. 26) and (Jones in Int Secur 32:7–40, 2008), governments and law enforcement organisations, such as the police, have looked to new strategies to counter violent extremism (Russell and Theodosiou in Counter-extremism: a decade on from 7/7. Quilliam Foundation, 2015). Specifically, there has been an expanse of the field now widely known as Countering Violent Extremism (CVE). CVE is a highly contested area; however, upon conducting a literature review, Inserra (Revisiting efforts to counter violent extremism: leadership needed. The Heritage Foundation, 2015, p. 2) helpfully reduced the term CVE down to descriptions of interventions intended to “stop individuals from radicalizing”. LaFree and Freilich (Annu Rev Criminol 2:383–404, 2019) distinguish counter-terrorism from CVE, they describe counter-terrorism as military responses (‘hard’) as opposed to non-military responses (‘soft’), referred to as countering violent extremism strategies. This chapter contends that, although counter narratives tend to lack academic standing, there does appear to be a widespread acceptance that narratives influence individuals’ beliefs. Therefore, in the absence of other more effective methods of CVE online, it is argued that counter-narratives (CN) should be used in informed ways by organisations such as the police (Monaghan in Crime Media Cult 18(1):21–39, 2020). This chapter will compare academic understandings of narrative and communication alongside examples of counter narratives issued against them. It will then assess the impact of such strategies and potential alternatives for CN.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aistrope T (2016) The Muslim paranoia narrative in counter-radicalisation policy. Crit Stud Terror 9(1):182–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2016.1175272
Ackerberg DA (2001) Empirically distinguishing informative and prestige effects of advertising. RAND J Econ 32(2):316–333
Aly A, Weimann-Saks D, Weimann G (2014) Making “noise” online: an analysis of the say no to terror online campaign. Perspect Terror 8(5):3–47
Aly A, Macdonald S, Jarvis L, Chen T (2016) Violent extremism online: new perspectives on terrorism and the internet. Routledge
Aziz SF (2017) Losing the war of ideas: a critique of countering violent extremism programs. Texas Int Law J 52:255
Bauman Z, Bigo D, Esteves P, Guild E, Jabri V, Lyon D, Walker RB (2014) After snowden: rethinking the impact of surveillance. Int Polit Sociol 8(2):121–144
Bélanger JJ, Nisa CF, Schumpe BM, Gurmu T, Williams MJ, Putra IE (2020) Do counter-narratives reduce support for ISIS? Yes, but not for their target audience. Front Psychol 11(1):126–144
Benson DC (2014) Why the Internet is not increasing terrorism. Secur Stud 23(2):293–328
Bennett WL, Lawrence RG, Livingston S (2006) None dare call it torture: indexing and the limits of press independence in the Abu Ghraib scandal. J Commun 56(3):467–485
Berger JM (2018) Extremism. MIT Press
Berger JM (2016) Making CVE work. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism, The Hague, p 7
Bertram L (2016) Terrorism, the Internet and the social media advantage: exploring how terrorist organizations exploit aspects of the Internet, social media and how these same platforms could be used to counter-violent extremism. J Deradical 7:225–252
Bertram L (2015) How could a terrorist be de-radicalised? J Deradical 23(1):44–63
Bineham JL (1988) A historical account of the hypodermic model in mass communication. Commun Monogr 55(3):230–246
Bishop P, Macdonald S (2019) Terrorist content and the social media ecosystem: the role of regulation. Digital Jihad: Online Commun Viol Extrem 31(1):135–152
Bodine-Baron E, Helmus TC, Magnuson M, Winkelman Z (2016) Examining ISIS support and opposition networks on Twitter. RAND Corporation
Bouhana N, Marchment Z, Schumann S (2018) Ours is not to reason why, but where: investigating the social ecology of radicalisation. American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA
Bouzis K (2015) Countering the Islamic State: US counterterrorism measures. Stud Confl Terror 38(10):885–897
Briggs R, Feve S (2013) Review of programs to counter narratives of violent extremism: what works and what are the implications for government? Institute for Strategic Dialogue
Braddock K (2020) Weaponized words: the strategic role of persuasion in violent radicalization and counter-radicalization. Cambridge University Press
Braddock K, Horgan J (2016) Towards a guide for constructing and disseminating counternarratives to reduce support for terrorism. Stud Confl Terror 39(5):381–404
Braddock K, Dillard JP (2016) Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Commun Monogr 83(4):446–467
Braddock KH (2012) Fighting words: the persuasive effect of online extremist narratives on the radicalization process. Pennsylvania State University Press
Brown K, Pearson E (2018) Social media, the online environment and terrorism. In: Routledge handbook of terrorism and counterterrorism. Routledge
Bull M, Rane H (2019) Beyond faith: social marginalisation and the prevention of radicalisation among young Muslim Australians. Crit Stud Terror 12(2):273–297
Cherney A, Murphy K (2017) Police and community cooperation in counterterrorism: evidence and insights from Australia. Stud Confl Terror 40(12):1023–1037
Crenshaw M (1981) The causes of terrorism. Comp Polit 13(4):379–399
Dean G, Bell P, Vakhitova Z (2016) Right-wing extremism in Australia: the rise of the new radical right. J Polic Intell Count Terror 11(2):121–142
English R (2010) Terrorism: how to respond. Oxford University Press
Europol (2019) 2019 EU Internet referral unit transparency report. https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-documents/eu-iru-transparency-report-2019. Accessed April 2021
Europa (2017) Countering terrorist narratives. Policy Department for Citizens Rights and Constitutional Affairs. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/596829/IPOL_STU(2017)596829_EN.pdf. Accessed April 2021
Fussey P, Sandhu A (2020) Surveillance arbitration in the era of digital policing. Theor Criminol 26(1):3–22
Frischlich L, Rieger D, Morten A, Bente G (2018) The power of a good story: narrative persuasion in extremist propaganda and videos against violent extremism. Int J Confl Viol (IJCV) 12(1):42–63
Gelfand MJ, LaFree G, Fahey S, Feinberg E (2013) Culture and extremism. J Soc Issues 69(3):495–517
Gill P, Corner E, Conway M, Thornton A, Bloom M, Horgan J (2017) Terrorist use of the Internet by the numbers: quantifying behaviors, patterns, and processes. Criminol Public Policy 16(1):99–117
Ganesh B, Bright J (2020) Countering extremists on social media: challenges for strategic communication and content moderation. Policy Internet 12(1):6–19
Gaudette T, Scrivens R, Venkatesh V (2020) The role of the Internet in facilitating violent extremism: insights from former right-wing extremists. Terror Polit Viol 21(1):1–18
Hemmingsen AS, Castro KI (2017) The trouble with counter-narratives (No. 2017: 01). DIIS report. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/197640/1/880712619.pdf. Accessed March 2021
Hamid N (2020) The ecology of extremists’ communications: messaging effectiveness, social environments and individual attributes. RUSI J 165(1):54–63
Harman J (2014) Future terrorists. Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2014/jan/06/opinion/la-oe-harman-terrorism-response20140106. Accessed March 2021
Hardy K (2018) Comparing theories of radicalisation with countering violent extremism policy. J Deradical 15:76–110
Ingram HJ (2016) A brief history of propaganda during conflict. The International Center for Counter-Terrorism, The Hague, p 7
Ingram HJ (2016) Deciphering the siren call of militant Islamist propaganda: meaning, credibility & behavioural change. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism, The Hague
Ingram HJ (2017) The strategic logic of the “linkage-based” approach to combating militant Islamist propaganda: conceptual and empirical. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism, The Hague
Inserra D (2015) Revisiting efforts to counter violent extremism: leadership needed. The Heritage Foundation, No. 4390
Jacobson M (2010) Terrorist dropouts: learning from those who have left. Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Jacobson M (2010) Terrorist financing and the Internet. Stud Confl Terror 33(4):353–363
Jones SG (2008) The rise of Afghanistan’s insurgency: state failure and Jihad. Int Secur 32(4):7–40
Kaplan JT, Gimbel SI, Harris S (2016) Neural correlates of maintaining one’s political beliefs in the face of counterevidence. Sci Rep 6(1):1–11
Katz R (2014) The State Department’s Twitter war with ISIS is embarrassing. Time Magazine. https://time.com/3387065/isis-twitter-war-state-department. Accessed March 2021
Koehler D (2014) The radical online: individual radicalization processes and the role of the Internet. J Deradical 1:116–134
Kovaleva N (2018) Russian information space, Russian scholarship, and Kremlin controls. Def Strat Commun 4(4):133–171
Life After Hate (2020) About us page. https://www.lifeafterhate.org/about-us-page. Accessed April 2021
LaFree G, Freilich JD (2019) Government policies for counteracting violent extremism. Annu Rev Criminol 2(1):383–404
Lavorgna A (2015) Organised crime goes online: realities and challenges. J Money Laund Control 18(2):153–168
Lee B (2019) Informal counter messaging: the potential and perils of the informal counter messaging space. Stud Confl Terror 42(1):161–177
Lee B (2020) Countering violent extremism online: the experiences of informal counter messaging actors. Policy Internet 12(1):66–87
Lee E, Leets L (2002) Persuasive storytelling by hate groups online: examining its effects on adolescents. Am Behav Sci 45(6):927–957
Leuprecht C, Hataley T, Moskalenko S, McCauley C (2009) Winning the battle but losing the war? Narrative and counter-narratives strategy. Perspect Terror 3(2):25–35
Lippmann W (1922) Public opinion. New York: Macmillan
Mackie DM (1986) Social identification effects in group polarization. J Pers Soc Psychol 50(4):720
Mahood S, Rane H (2017) Islamist narratives in ISIS recruitment propaganda. J Int Commun 23(1):15–35
McCants W, Watts C (2012) U.S. strategy for countering violent extremism: an assessment. Foreign Policy Research Institute. http://www.fpri.org/articles/2012/12/us-strategy-countering-violent-extremism-assessment. Accessed April 2021
McNeill BW (1989) Reconceptualizing social influence in counseling: the Elaboration Likelihood Model. J Couns Psychol 36(1):24–33
Monaci S (2017) Explaining the Islamic state’s online media strategy: a transmedia approach. Int J Commun 11(1):19
Monaghan J (2022) Performing counter-terrorism: police newsmaking and the dramaturgy of security. Crime Media Cult 18(1):21–39
Müller F, van Zoonen L, Hirzalla F (2014) Anti-Islam propaganda and its effects: fitna, fear-based communication and the moderating role of public debate. Middle East J Cult Commun 7(1):82–100
Nacos BL (2009) Revisiting the contagion hypothesis: terrorism, news coverage, and copycat attacks. Perspect Terror 3(3):3–13
Nashar M, Nayef H (2019) ‘Cooking the meal of terror’ manipulative strategies in terrorist discourse: a critical discourse analysis of ISIS statements. Terror Polit Viol 3:1–21
Neumann PR (2003) The trouble with radicalization. Int Aff 89(4):873–893
Neumann PR (2013) Options and strategies for countering online radicalization in the United States. Stud Confl Terror 36(6):431–459
O’Hara K, Stevens D (2015) Echo chambers and online radicalism: assessing the Internet’s complicity in violent extremism. Policy Internet 7(4):401–422
Papadopoulos S, Kompatsiaris Y, Vakali A, Spyridonos P (2012) Community detection in social media. Data Min Knowl Disc 24(3):515–554
Perliger A, Milton D (2016) From cradle to grave: the lifecycle of foreign fighters in Iraq and Syria. US Military Academy-Combating Terrorism Center West Point United States
Petty RE, Briñol P (2011) The elaboration likelihood model. Handb Theor Soc Psychol 1:224–245
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Communication and persuasion. Springer
Quiggin T (2009) Understanding al-Qaeda’s ideology for counter-narrative work. Perspect Terror 3(2):18–24
Reed A, Dowling J (2018) The role of historical narratives in extremist propaganda. Def Strat Commun 4(1):79–104
Reed A (2017) IS propaganda: should we counter the narrative? International Centre for Counter-Terrorism, The Hague. https://icct.nl/publication/is-propaganda-should-we-counter-the-narrative/. Accessed April 2021
Reed A (2017) Counter-terrorism strategic communications: back to the future—lessons from past and present. In: Conway M, Jarvis L, Lehane O (eds) Terrorists’ use of the Internet: assessment and response. Los Press, pp 269–278
Rocca NM (2017) Mobilization and radicalization through persuasion: manipulative techniques in ISIS’ propaganda. Int Relat Dipl 5(11):660–670
Roselle L, Miskimmon A, O’loughlin B (2014) Strategic narrative: a new means to understand soft power. Media War Confl 7(1):70–84
Le Roux P (2019) Responding to the rise in violent extremism in the Sahel. Africa Center for Strategic Studies, p 26
Redirect Method (2019) The redirect method—a blueprint for bypassing extremism. https://redirectmethod.org/downloads/RedirectMethod-FullMethod-PDF.pdf. Accessed April 2021
Russell J, Theodosiou A (2015) Counter-extremism: a decade on from 7/7. Quilliam Foundation
Schils N, Verhage A (2017) Understanding how and why young people enter radical or violent extremist groups. Int J Confl Viol 11:473–473
Schieb C, Preuss M (2018) Considering the elaboration likelihood model for simulating hate and counter speech on Facebook. SCM Stud Commun Media 7(4):580–606
Schmid AP (2013) Radicalisation, de-radicalisation, counter-radicalisation: a conceptual discussion and literature review. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism. http://www.icct.nl/download/file/ICCT-Schmid-Radicalisation-De-Radicalisation-Counter-Radicalisation-March-2013.pdf. Accessed April 2021
Schmid AP (2015) Challenging the narrative of the “Islamic State.” International Centre for Counter-Terrorism, The Hague, pp 1–19
Sheikh H, Gómez Á, Atran S (2016) Empirical evidence for the devoted actor model. Curr Anthropol 57(13):204–209
Silverman T, Stewart CJ, Birdwell J, Amanullah Z (2016) The impact of counter-narratives. Institute for Strategic Dialogue, pp 1–54
Slater MD, Rouner D (2002) Entertainment, education and elaboration likelihood: understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Commun Theory 12(2):173–191
Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal: Int J 24(2):311–322
Speckhard A, Shajkovci A, Bodo L (2018) Fighting ISIS on Facebook—breaking the ISIS brand counter-narratives project. http://www.icsve.org/research-reports/fighting-isis-onfacebook-breaking-the-isis-brand-counter-narratives-project/. Accessed April 2022
Spencer A (2006) The problems of evaluating counter-terrorism. Revista UNISCI 12:179–201
Stevens T, Neumann PR (2009) Countering online radicalisation: a strategy for action. The International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence, London. https://cst.org.uk/docs/countering_online_radicalisation1.pdf. Accessed March 2021
Supreme Court of the United States (1968) U.S. reports: Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444. Retrieved from the Library of Congress: https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep395444/. Accessed March 2021
Szmania S, Fincher P (2017) Countering violent extremism online and offline. Criminol Public Policy 16:119–132
Thomas M (2019) Was television responsible for a new generation of smokers? J Consum Res 46(4):689–707
U.K. Government (2019) Public perceptions of extremism report. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/835681/Public_Perceptions_of_Extremism_Interim_report_Final_.pdf. Accessed April 2021
U.K. Government (2019) Online Harms White Paper. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/973939/Online_Harms_White_Paper_V2.pdf. Accessed April 2021
United Nations (2017) Security Council Resolution 2017. https://www.undocs.org/S/RES/2017%20(2011). Accessed April 2021
Watt E (2017) The right to privacy and the future of mass surveillance. Int J Human Rights 21(7):773–799
Weimann G (2007) Using the Internet for terrorist. Hypermedia seduction for terrorist recruiting 25:47
Williams MJ (2020) Preventing and countering violent extremism: designing and evaluating evidence-based programs. Taylor & Francis
Williford AC (2018) Blurred lines: what is extremism. J Law Reform 52:913–937
Yu J (2018) Regulation of social media platforms to curb ISIS incitement and recruitment: the need for an international framework and its free speech implications. J Glob Justice Public Policy 4(1):122–136
Zeiger S, Aly A (2015) Countering violent extremism: developing an evidence-base for policy and practice. Curtin University
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rees, J., Montasari, R. (2023). The Use of Counter Narratives to Combat Violent Extremism Online. In: Montasari, R., Carpenter, V., Masys, A.J. (eds) Digital Transformation in Policing: The Promise, Perils and Solutions. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09691-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09691-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09690-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09691-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)