Online Library

Welcome to VOX-Pol’s Online Library, a research and teaching resource, which collects in one place a large volume of publications related to various aspects of violent online political extremism.

Search

Quick Search Advanced Search

Full Listing

2172 Library Entries

Clear Search

Type	Title	Year	Author	Links
VOX-Pol Blog	Seeing Eye to Eye: Countering the ‘illusion of inclusion’ in P/CVE multistakeholder initiatives View Abstract Seeing Eye to Eye: Countering the ‘illusion of inclusion’ in P/CVE multistakeholder initiatives VOX-Pol Blog post. View Full Article	2024	Azhar, H.	View Publisher
VOX-Pol Blog	Seeing Eye to Eye: Recognising the ‘Public’ as a Stakeholder in Multistakeholder Initiatives View Abstract Seeing Eye to Eye: Recognising the ‘Public’ as a Stakeholder in Multistakeholder Initiatives VOX-Pol Blog post. View Full Article	2024	Rees, C.	View Publisher
VOX-Pol Blog	Seeing Eye to Eye: The Crucial Role of Legitimacy in Multistakeholder Initiatives View Abstract Seeing Eye to Eye: The Crucial Role of Legitimacy in Multistakeholder Initiatives VOX-Pol Blog post. View Full Article	2024	Brost, L.	View Publisher
VOX-Pol Blog	Seeing Eye to Eye: The Delphi Method & Potential Benefits to Mulistakeholderism in the P/CVE Space View Abstract Seeing Eye to Eye: The Delphi Method & Potential Benefits to Mulistakeholderism in the P/CVE Space VOX-Pol Blog post. View Full Article	2024	Frenguelli, F.	View Publisher
VOX-Pol Blog	Seeing Eye to Eye: Viewing Multistakeholder Work through a Participatory Lens View Abstract Seeing Eye to Eye: Viewing Multistakeholder Work through a Participatory Lens VOX-Pol Blog post. View Full Article	2024	Mattheis, A. A,	View Publisher
Report	Self-regulation and ‘hate speech’ on social media platforms View Abstract Self-regulation and ‘hate speech’ on social media platforms In this brief, ARTICLE 19 seeks to contribute to discussions on greater regulation of social media platforms, including calls for such platforms to be considered publishers. We do so by exploring a possible model for the independent and effective self regulation of social media platforms. ARTICLE 19 recognises that dominant social media companies hold considerable power over the flow of information and ideas online, given the vast quantities of content published on their platforms. The way in which social media companies have dealt with content issues on their platforms, especially around ‘hate speech’, has been of particular concern to many stakeholders. Under international standards on freedom of expression, however, it is a fairly complex task to decide whether a specific message can be identified as unlawful ‘hate speech’, and, as such, whether it should or could legitimately be prohibited. More generally, any restriction on freedom of expression, whatever the objective it seeks to achieve, necessarily raises a series of legal questions. View Full Article	2018	Free Word Centre	View Publisher

Prev
Page1
…
Page242
Page243
Page244
Page245
Page246
…
Page362
Next